<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Adobe protects Flash trademark, but at what cost?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.flashblog.co.uk/adobe-protects-flash-trademark-but-at-what-cost/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.flashblog.co.uk/adobe-protects-flash-trademark-but-at-what-cost/</link>
	<description>Flash tutorials, Flash News and inspiration</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Sep 2010 12:23:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Gareth</title>
		<link>http://www.flashblog.co.uk/adobe-protects-flash-trademark-but-at-what-cost/comment-page-1/#comment-500</link>
		<dc:creator>Gareth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 16:00:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.flashblog.co.uk/?p=1276#comment-500</guid>
		<description>I think you are probably right.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think you are probably right.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mpc</title>
		<link>http://www.flashblog.co.uk/adobe-protects-flash-trademark-but-at-what-cost/comment-page-1/#comment-476</link>
		<dc:creator>mpc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 10:00:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.flashblog.co.uk/?p=1276#comment-476</guid>
		<description>In my opinion Adobe wants to extend their marketplace and they will sell Flash files so the first think to do is to get rid of competitors.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In my opinion Adobe wants to extend their marketplace and they will sell Flash files so the first think to do is to get rid of competitors.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wyvie</title>
		<link>http://www.flashblog.co.uk/adobe-protects-flash-trademark-but-at-what-cost/comment-page-1/#comment-405</link>
		<dc:creator>Wyvie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Oct 2009 23:40:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.flashblog.co.uk/?p=1276#comment-405</guid>
		<description>Reminds me so much of when Virgin bashed their way through Australia (perhaps they did the whole world at the same time), destroying any company that had &quot;Virgin&quot; in the name. They ended up forcing renames of any company in Aus that started after Virgin did, even though it was a very long time before it became a known name over here. Car yards, chocolate manufacturers, all fell before the might that is an American company who thinks they run the world.

What gets me the most is that Flashkit and Flashearth and all those other places that come up earlier in Google searches seem to have been left alone.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Reminds me so much of when Virgin bashed their way through Australia (perhaps they did the whole world at the same time), destroying any company that had &#8220;Virgin&#8221; in the name. They ended up forcing renames of any company in Aus that started after Virgin did, even though it was a very long time before it became a known name over here. Car yards, chocolate manufacturers, all fell before the might that is an American company who thinks they run the world.</p>
<p>What gets me the most is that Flashkit and Flashearth and all those other places that come up earlier in Google searches seem to have been left alone.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: flashmad</title>
		<link>http://www.flashblog.co.uk/adobe-protects-flash-trademark-but-at-what-cost/comment-page-1/#comment-289</link>
		<dc:creator>flashmad</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Oct 2009 08:46:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.flashblog.co.uk/?p=1276#comment-289</guid>
		<description>lol my domain is flashmadblog . will they kick my ass??</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>lol my domain is flashmadblog . will they kick my ass??</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Iulian</title>
		<link>http://www.flashblog.co.uk/adobe-protects-flash-trademark-but-at-what-cost/comment-page-1/#comment-268</link>
		<dc:creator>Iulian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Oct 2009 15:55:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.flashblog.co.uk/?p=1276#comment-268</guid>
		<description>If the word &quot;Flash&quot; is a trademark, then couldn&#039;t Envato have used the work &quot;flash&quot; to make &quot;flashden&quot; or &quot;flashDen&quot; ?

If &quot;flash&quot; is a common English word, it cannot possibly be restricted.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If the word &#8220;Flash&#8221; is a trademark, then couldn&#8217;t Envato have used the work &#8220;flash&#8221; to make &#8220;flashden&#8221; or &#8220;flashDen&#8221; ?</p>
<p>If &#8220;flash&#8221; is a common English word, it cannot possibly be restricted.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: giuseppe</title>
		<link>http://www.flashblog.co.uk/adobe-protects-flash-trademark-but-at-what-cost/comment-page-1/#comment-243</link>
		<dc:creator>giuseppe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Oct 2009 07:40:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.flashblog.co.uk/?p=1276#comment-243</guid>
		<description>words are free.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>words are free.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gareth</title>
		<link>http://www.flashblog.co.uk/adobe-protects-flash-trademark-but-at-what-cost/comment-page-1/#comment-241</link>
		<dc:creator>Gareth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2009 11:47:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.flashblog.co.uk/?p=1276#comment-241</guid>
		<description>Kires, I think you are right,but maybe there is more to it. Its been suggested that they attacked the Air sites because they were competing with their own marketplace. Maybe Adobe wants to get into selling Flash stock files.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kires, I think you are right,but maybe there is more to it. Its been suggested that they attacked the Air sites because they were competing with their own marketplace. Maybe Adobe wants to get into selling Flash stock files.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kires</title>
		<link>http://www.flashblog.co.uk/adobe-protects-flash-trademark-but-at-what-cost/comment-page-1/#comment-240</link>
		<dc:creator>kires</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2009 11:27:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.flashblog.co.uk/?p=1276#comment-240</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s plain stupid. And all of this after they&#039;ve been using Flashden files: http://blog.flashden.net/general/adobecom-use-flashden-product/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s plain stupid. And all of this after they&#8217;ve been using Flashden files: <a href="http://blog.flashden.net/general/adobecom-use-flashden-product/" rel="nofollow">http://blog.flashden.net/general/adobecom-use-flashden-product/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gareth</title>
		<link>http://www.flashblog.co.uk/adobe-protects-flash-trademark-but-at-what-cost/comment-page-1/#comment-239</link>
		<dc:creator>Gareth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2009 11:01:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.flashblog.co.uk/?p=1276#comment-239</guid>
		<description>Bob - that`s what I meant be &quot;sway&quot; and Adobe acting as the 800lb gorilla.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bob &#8211; that`s what I meant be &#8220;sway&#8221; and Adobe acting as the 800lb gorilla.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bob</title>
		<link>http://www.flashblog.co.uk/adobe-protects-flash-trademark-but-at-what-cost/comment-page-1/#comment-238</link>
		<dc:creator>bob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2009 11:00:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.flashblog.co.uk/?p=1276#comment-238</guid>
		<description>&quot;Clearly the Adobe legal team has enough sway to make these sites change names – without much resistance.&quot;

you front up the legal costs and I&#039;m sure they&#039;ll be happy to resist.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Clearly the Adobe legal team has enough sway to make these sites change names – without much resistance.&#8221;</p>
<p>you front up the legal costs and I&#8217;m sure they&#8217;ll be happy to resist.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
